C- Making editors identifiable incentivizes high quality reviews
Authored By:: P- Brendan Langen
Part of our challenge is solving, Q- How can people maintain a decentralized discourse graph with a high quantity of information in it?
By allowing C- Anonymous contributions to a decentralized discourse graph enable balanced review, we enable for reviews to be unbiased. However, because we want our information to be valid, we also need to answer, Q- How can we incentivize generative contributions to a decentralized discourse graph? C- Curation is an important role in maintaining a decentralized discourse graph, and staking rewards for editing is a step to ensuring high quality.
(Rough idea here) I- Incentivize high quality review through token distribution.
Imagine if editors received a token for their peer-reviewed contributions. Q- What would a Web3 Wikipedia look like. In a way, we are applying the same principles as Audius. C- The incentives of Audius explicitly value curation