Reasons for the use and non‐use of electronic journals and databases
- #references
- Title: Reasons for the use and non‐use of electronic journals and databases: A domain analytic study in four scholarly disciplines
- Authored by:: Sanna Talja , Hanni Maula
- Tags:: #Synthesis Infrastructure #Domain-Analysis
- Year: 2003
- Publication: Journal of Documentation
- Reading notes
- Key ideas:
- paradigmatic relevance is an important and distinct notion of relevance (compared to Topical Relevance) in scholarly information seeking (p. 676)
- Some kinds of information seeking strategies are better fits for paradigmatic relevance
- #Claim Subject headings and keyword searches are more effective for domains with high Topical Relevance; in domains characterized more by paradigmatic relevance, these stragies are less useful, and other strategies like chaining or Browsing are more powerful. (p. 683)
- Similar result to @bates2002speculations’s hypothesized advantage of chaining in high-Scatter domains
- #Claim Subject headings and keyword searches are more effective for domains with high Topical Relevance; in domains characterized more by paradigmatic relevance, these stragies are less useful, and other strategies like chaining or Browsing are more powerful. (p. 683)
- Potentially related to idea of the degree of Scatter in a domain
- Some kinds of information seeking strategies are better fits for paradigmatic relevance
- Tricky to draw boundaries around what we mean by Domain, but it’s supposed to be above an individual scholar, and includes some the scholar’s context, but more granular than a “field”
- One interesting finding re: field size (contra R: bates2002speculations)
- paradigmatic relevance is an important and distinct notion of relevance (compared to Topical Relevance) in scholarly information seeking (p. 676)
- Key ideas: